Spoiled by Google, In Love with Word Spy

No, I don’t mean the IPO that a Playboy interview almost derailed. I mean the growing sophistication of Google and other WWW search engines. I used to have to think carefully about my search terms, remember my Boolean operators (I’ve always loved that phrase–“call now, Boolean AND operators are OR standing NOR by–all the librarians just hit the floor laughing), try to match my sense of what I wanted with a sense of the likely indexing scheme the engine (or, in earlier days, the book) would have adopted.

Now, however, I just type in something like “what is a vortal?” and Google takes me to a list of sites with answers. And that’s not all, Ginsu knife fans. Because I haven’t done my search with indexing in mind, the associative trail is littered with more opportunities for serendipitous discovery, at least so far. Case in point today: “what is a vortal?” brought me eventually to Word Spy. What’s Word Spy? Here’s the way the site defines itself:

This Web site is devoted to lexpionage, the sleuthing of new words and phrases. These aren’t “stunt words” or “sniglets,” but new terms that have appeared multiple times in newspapers, magazines, books, Web sites, and other recorded sources.

Now, of course, I need to look up “stunt words” and “sniglets.” “Lexpionage” I think I can figure out. Ironically, none of those words is defined on Word Spy, though in finding that out I did happen onto the definition of “Google Bomb,” which I blush to admit was a new term for me.

Time for another search.

2 thoughts on “Spoiled by Google, In Love with Word Spy

  1. OK, sadly, I was caught off guard by Google Bomb. Guess after the announcement today they were reducing the stock price, I was thinking it might be Wall Street related. How ironic when I googled the term, I hit The Spy Word site with the definition. Wonder what Urban Dictionary has to say…

  2. Ther’s one thing that keeps bothering me about the results retruned by Google and most other search tools. They are easy to use and they retunr a number of relevant results, but are the results the best ones we can get or are they merely ‘good enough.’ Maybe our questions aren’t that deep and so the answers are OK and match the depth of the query. Clustering of results is a pretty neat thing too – vivisimo.com, and teoma.com has some help with searching. Want a good time? Type elgoog into the search field at google and click on I’m feeling lucky (or try http://www.alltooflat.com/geeky/elgoog/ – same thing.)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.