{"id":244,"date":"2005-09-12T08:49:49","date_gmt":"2005-09-12T12:49:49","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.gardnercampbell.net\/blog1\/?p=244"},"modified":"2005-09-12T08:49:49","modified_gmt":"2005-09-12T12:49:49","slug":"steves-experiment-continues","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.gardnercampbell.net\/blog1\/steves-experiment-continues\/","title":{"rendered":"Steve&#039;s Experiment Continues"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Over at Pedablogy, Steve Greenlaw <a href=\"http:\/\/jerryslezak.net\/pedablogy\/?p=131\">reflects on the end of week two<\/a> of his experiment in a thoroughly (aggressively? persistently? recurrently?) metacognitive classroom. I&#8217;m interested to see that Steve&#8217;s exceptionally thoughtful account ends with a student telling him &#8220;now I know what you&#8217;re looking for.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>My first thought is, &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/people.umw.edu\/~sgreenla\/e201\/Framework%20for%20the%20abstract%20metacognitive%20activities.doc\">what else would any teacher be looking for<\/a>?&#8221; Identifying major concepts, distinguishing them from minor concepts, and applying either or both to new contexts: these are real school skills of the highest order and greatest importance. My second thought is that the comment typifies intellectual laziness and a kind  of cynical cost-benefit analysis, viz., &#8220;I&#8217;m not trying to get an education here; I&#8217;m trying to suss out the teacher&#8217;s expectations and take the path of least resistance to meeting them.&#8221; My third thought is that it&#8217;s an honest question, and that enough teachers (for whatever reasons) don&#8217;t ask for metacognition that students are genuinely puzzled about the &#8220;rules of engagement&#8221; when one teacher does.<\/p>\n<p>Perhaps the truth is some combination of all three thoughts.<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;m still haunted by Walker Percy&#8217;s &#8220;The Loss of the Creature&#8221; in this regard: to say what you&#8217;re looking for (which I distinguish to some extent from clarifying the assignment, which is what Steve did) is to guarantee the student cannot find it. It&#8217;s interesting that institutionalized education hides this fact from itself, or seems to. Or maybe (probably!) I&#8217;m just being willful to say to students, &#8220;I&#8217;m looking for you to show me something I didn&#8217;t know I was looking for.&#8221; The catalyst for student discovery can be a lecture, an aside, a moment&#8217;s discussion outside class, an email, a clipping, a cartoon. In short, real school is built on such catalysis (<a href=\"http:\/\/www.itc.virginia.edu\/virginia.edu\/spring04\/alchemy.htm\">footnote here to my IT boss, Chip German<\/a>), and such catalysis can appear anywhere at any time. The trick is to surround students with sense, or potential sense, and to strengthen them with a persistent feeling of expectation, and with the tools of preparedness.<\/p>\n<p>Steve&#8217;s obviously doing that, and in that way his &#8220;experiment&#8221; feels more like a reaffirmation to me. You go, Dr. Greenlaw.<\/p>\n<p>EDIT: Konrad Glogowski&#8217;s aptly named &#8220;Blog of Proximal Development&#8221; also treats these issues <a href=\"http:\/\/www.teachandlearn.ca\/blog\/2005\/07\/25\/evaluation\/\">here<\/a>. I continue to wish for a stimulating synthesis of a) pylons and b) the thrill of the run. Seems to me a curriculum ought to have both (and will need both). Tennis, with a net.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Over at Pedablogy, Steve Greenlaw reflects on the end of week two of his experiment in a thoroughly (aggressively? persistently? recurrently?) metacognitive classroom. I&#8217;m interested to see that Steve&#8217;s exceptionally thoughtful account ends with a student telling him &#8220;now I &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.gardnercampbell.net\/blog1\/steves-experiment-continues\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-244","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p4bHwM-3W","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.gardnercampbell.net\/blog1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/244","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.gardnercampbell.net\/blog1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.gardnercampbell.net\/blog1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.gardnercampbell.net\/blog1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.gardnercampbell.net\/blog1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=244"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.gardnercampbell.net\/blog1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/244\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.gardnercampbell.net\/blog1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=244"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.gardnercampbell.net\/blog1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=244"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.gardnercampbell.net\/blog1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=244"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}