<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: George Steiner on teachers and students, part three</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gardnercampbell.net/blog1/?feed=rss2&#038;p=474" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gardnercampbell.net/blog1/?p=474</link>
	<description>Aut Inveniam, Aut Faciam</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 05:18:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=7394</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gardner Writes &#187; Blog Archive &#187; No more pendulums</title>
		<link>http://www.gardnercampbell.net/blog1/?p=474&#038;cpage=1#comment-866</link>
		<dc:creator>Gardner Writes &#187; Blog Archive &#187; No more pendulums</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 10:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gardnercampbell.net/blog1/?p=474#comment-866</guid>
		<description>[...] I am not sure what to do about this situation. I do feel strongly, however, that we must immediately abandon talk about &#8220;learner-centered&#8221; or &#8220;student-centered&#8221; education vs. &#8220;teacher-centered&#8221; education. That dichotomy seems very appealing on the surface, especially because it seems very democratic, and also because of the home truth that only the student can decide to learn. I embrace that home truth, wholeheartedly. No teacher can decide that a student will learn, and no system can simulate that decision for the student in any truly effective way. No system should try. Nevertheless, &#8220;student-centered&#8221; starts to sound like &#8220;power to the people&#8221; to me at times, and I&#8217;m increasingly skeptical that it means what we want it to mean. Who are these people and what is the power we imagine? (Related question: Why do we think most students are unhappy with a transactional model? I&#8217;m not sure that most of them are.) I also think, with all due respect, that &#8220;student-centered&#8221; can all too easily become a communitarian fiction that hides the real power, and the real value, of teaching, and teachers, and mastery. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I am not sure what to do about this situation. I do feel strongly, however, that we must immediately abandon talk about &#8220;learner-centered&#8221; or &#8220;student-centered&#8221; education vs. &#8220;teacher-centered&#8221; education. That dichotomy seems very appealing on the surface, especially because it seems very democratic, and also because of the home truth that only the student can decide to learn. I embrace that home truth, wholeheartedly. No teacher can decide that a student will learn, and no system can simulate that decision for the student in any truly effective way. No system should try. Nevertheless, &#8220;student-centered&#8221; starts to sound like &#8220;power to the people&#8221; to me at times, and I&#8217;m increasingly skeptical that it means what we want it to mean. Who are these people and what is the power we imagine? (Related question: Why do we think most students are unhappy with a transactional model? I&#8217;m not sure that most of them are.) I also think, with all due respect, that &#8220;student-centered&#8221; can all too easily become a communitarian fiction that hides the real power, and the real value, of teaching, and teachers, and mastery. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
