<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Changing lives</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gardnercampbell.net/blog1/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1224" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gardnercampbell.net/blog1/?p=1224</link>
	<description>Aut Inveniam, Aut Faciam</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 05:18:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=6394</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Martha</title>
		<link>http://www.gardnercampbell.net/blog1/?p=1224&#038;cpage=1#comment-1941</link>
		<dc:creator>Martha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 00:44:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gardnercampbell.net/blog1/?p=1224#comment-1941</guid>
		<description>Perhaps it&#039;s because I&#039;m in the throws of watching a four-year-old come into her own wrt to learning at the moment, but I find myself believing more and more in the power of the human brain to adapt to a myriad of influences and complications. For me, as I witness this unfolding of a mind, it&#039;s impossible not to believe that, while we may be in place of discomfort right now, we will most certainly learn how to live within this new space -- and in doing so I really do believe that we will also figure out how to solve bigger, more complex problems with increased creativity and ingenuity. I think that&#039;s the real story of human experience, a constant melody of key changes and new resonances (forgive what I am sure is a terrible musical metaphor there -- you know I&#039;m musically challenged. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps it&#8217;s because I&#8217;m in the throws of watching a four-year-old come into her own wrt to learning at the moment, but I find myself believing more and more in the power of the human brain to adapt to a myriad of influences and complications. For me, as I witness this unfolding of a mind, it&#8217;s impossible not to believe that, while we may be in place of discomfort right now, we will most certainly learn how to live within this new space &#8212; and in doing so I really do believe that we will also figure out how to solve bigger, more complex problems with increased creativity and ingenuity. I think that&#8217;s the real story of human experience, a constant melody of key changes and new resonances (forgive what I am sure is a terrible musical metaphor there &#8212; you know I&#8217;m musically challenged. <img src='http://www.gardnercampbell.net/blog1/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne Bowery</title>
		<link>http://www.gardnercampbell.net/blog1/?p=1224&#038;cpage=1#comment-1936</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne Bowery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 20:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gardnercampbell.net/blog1/?p=1224#comment-1936</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know if it is all resistance to change, Sandy,  at least not in an unreflective way. Speaking for myself,  I do change and adapt to new technology and  to the extent I have, I&#039;m the better for it and my students are, but that is also because I&#039;m careful to make it be authentically part of what I already do. I&#039;m not embracing it for the sake of embracing technology and trying something new just because it is a social media that is here now, so why not use it.  

 Gardner, you  might be running into a wall   because there really is a wall there but not in the sense that it is the wall of the old way of doing that we have to get over or tear down.. or at least not only that... it may be that the wall is in front of the new  the wall is part of the making of a new way of doing.   I couldn&#039;t help but think of  Pink Floyd&#039;s  Another Brick in the Wall   when I read your post  title.  I  wonder....  are we also creating a new cave/ a new web of social structures with their own modes of indoctrinating discourse  that will box us in ways we never imagined and perhaps all the more so  because we are embracing it as a revolutionary force. 

Anyway, more on all this on my own blog. 

We don&#039;t need no education
We don,t need no thought control
No dark sarcasm in the classroom
Teachers leave them kids alone
Hey! Teachers! Leave them kids alone!
All in all it&#039;s just another brick in the wall.
All in all you&#039;re just another brick in the wall.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know if it is all resistance to change, Sandy,  at least not in an unreflective way. Speaking for myself,  I do change and adapt to new technology and  to the extent I have, I&#8217;m the better for it and my students are, but that is also because I&#8217;m careful to make it be authentically part of what I already do. I&#8217;m not embracing it for the sake of embracing technology and trying something new just because it is a social media that is here now, so why not use it.  </p>
<p> Gardner, you  might be running into a wall   because there really is a wall there but not in the sense that it is the wall of the old way of doing that we have to get over or tear down.. or at least not only that&#8230; it may be that the wall is in front of the new  the wall is part of the making of a new way of doing.   I couldn&#8217;t help but think of  Pink Floyd&#8217;s  Another Brick in the Wall   when I read your post  title.  I  wonder&#8230;.  are we also creating a new cave/ a new web of social structures with their own modes of indoctrinating discourse  that will box us in ways we never imagined and perhaps all the more so  because we are embracing it as a revolutionary force. </p>
<p>Anyway, more on all this on my own blog. </p>
<p>We don&#8217;t need no education<br />
We don,t need no thought control<br />
No dark sarcasm in the classroom<br />
Teachers leave them kids alone<br />
Hey! Teachers! Leave them kids alone!<br />
All in all it&#8217;s just another brick in the wall.<br />
All in all you&#8217;re just another brick in the wall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gene Roche</title>
		<link>http://www.gardnercampbell.net/blog1/?p=1224&#038;cpage=1#comment-1927</link>
		<dc:creator>Gene Roche</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 23:14:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gardnercampbell.net/blog1/?p=1224#comment-1927</guid>
		<description>Let me echo the sentiments of earlier responders--thanks for continuing to challenge us to continue to wrestle with the questions.  I&#039;ve had a number of those nightmares where I&#039;ve awakened in a cold sweat to the revelation that google actually does make us stupid and that all the evangelism for blogs, wikis, collaboration and all that stuff led a whole generation into a oblivion. Who knows how many articles in peer-reviewed journal articles this generation would have created if we hadn&#039;t led them astray with BlueHost accounts and Wordpress MultiUser blogs.  

It doesn&#039;t take me long, though, to realize that most of the world finds our (academics) obsession with sustained arguments and juried journals to be very curious.  For most of the rest of the world, sustained arguments are over-rated.  The ability to find something you&#039;re passionate about, connect with others who share that passion, respond to changing environments, tell stories and feed your creativity with a constant stream of new ideas are far more important.   The ability to do those things in a sustained way for a life-time is what you&#039;re banging your head against to wall to achieve.

Keep the faith.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me echo the sentiments of earlier responders&#8211;thanks for continuing to challenge us to continue to wrestle with the questions.  I&#8217;ve had a number of those nightmares where I&#8217;ve awakened in a cold sweat to the revelation that google actually does make us stupid and that all the evangelism for blogs, wikis, collaboration and all that stuff led a whole generation into a oblivion. Who knows how many articles in peer-reviewed journal articles this generation would have created if we hadn&#8217;t led them astray with BlueHost accounts and Wordpress MultiUser blogs.  </p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t take me long, though, to realize that most of the world finds our (academics) obsession with sustained arguments and juried journals to be very curious.  For most of the rest of the world, sustained arguments are over-rated.  The ability to find something you&#8217;re passionate about, connect with others who share that passion, respond to changing environments, tell stories and feed your creativity with a constant stream of new ideas are far more important.   The ability to do those things in a sustained way for a life-time is what you&#8217;re banging your head against to wall to achieve.</p>
<p>Keep the faith.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandy Bennett</title>
		<link>http://www.gardnercampbell.net/blog1/?p=1224&#038;cpage=1#comment-1926</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandy Bennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 21:55:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gardnercampbell.net/blog1/?p=1224#comment-1926</guid>
		<description>Great Post!  I really appreciate your ability to try to make us stretch outside of our own worlds while we trying to create new realities with the concepts that are new to us.   

Yes, at this time ICT is disruptive becuase it is causing us to change our paradigms.  I do think that ICT opens us up to create better outputs with assistance from others. The outputs (for lack of a better term on my part) that we can create are a shift that ICT technology is affording us to do on a grander scheme than we ever thought possible before.  One mind creating something new with the assistance of many in real time as we are actually going through creation process. Very Powerful.

The wall that you are slamming up against is resistance to change. It takes both time and a change agent to break down that wall.  Keep being our agent of change.  We will get there!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great Post!  I really appreciate your ability to try to make us stretch outside of our own worlds while we trying to create new realities with the concepts that are new to us.   </p>
<p>Yes, at this time ICT is disruptive becuase it is causing us to change our paradigms.  I do think that ICT opens us up to create better outputs with assistance from others. The outputs (for lack of a better term on my part) that we can create are a shift that ICT technology is affording us to do on a grander scheme than we ever thought possible before.  One mind creating something new with the assistance of many in real time as we are actually going through creation process. Very Powerful.</p>
<p>The wall that you are slamming up against is resistance to change. It takes both time and a change agent to break down that wall.  Keep being our agent of change.  We will get there!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.gardnercampbell.net/blog1/?p=1224&#038;cpage=1#comment-1922</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 13:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gardnercampbell.net/blog1/?p=1224#comment-1922</guid>
		<description>Great post, Gardner!  It reminds me why I love to read your writing.  You find a way to articulate abstract ideas, feelings really, that are flying around my head but unable to land.  As both you and Rachel alluded to, understanding the question (and identifying follow-up questions) is the first step towards finding an answer.  Learning is messy.  Sometimes it&#039;s the struggle, the process that teaches you, even when you haven&#039;t found &quot;the&quot; answer.  Learning may not mean finding the answer but studying the questions.  Much to think about here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, Gardner!  It reminds me why I love to read your writing.  You find a way to articulate abstract ideas, feelings really, that are flying around my head but unable to land.  As both you and Rachel alluded to, understanding the question (and identifying follow-up questions) is the first step towards finding an answer.  Learning is messy.  Sometimes it&#8217;s the struggle, the process that teaches you, even when you haven&#8217;t found &#8220;the&#8221; answer.  Learning may not mean finding the answer but studying the questions.  Much to think about here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.gardnercampbell.net/blog1/?p=1224&#038;cpage=1#comment-1916</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 01:10:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gardnercampbell.net/blog1/?p=1224#comment-1916</guid>
		<description>I think you&#039;re in good company when you hit that wall, Gardner. The questions that keep returning to my mind is this: Why is it so disruptive? What is it about having access to ICT that makes it more difficult to be a traditional student? Is it the increased access to more/better/worse/different/wrong information, or the ability to communicate with remote friends when one should be reflecting/studying/quietly having a one-on-one conversation, or the fact that these technologies just don&#039;t resemble the things that usually look like scholarship (the term paper, syllabus, lab report)? What about the cases where ICT enables students to study better, or include more perspectives, or have more &quot;Aha!&quot; moments?

What if it&#039;s not just the ICT? What if it&#039;s the intersection of ICT, faculty expectations, and student attitudes or abilities? I keep thinking there&#039;s a deeper question here and I just can&#039;t see it. Maybe I spend too much time on Twitter...

Not looking for answers, just adding to the pile of questions. Thanks for the post -- it&#039;s good to know you wonder about this too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#8217;re in good company when you hit that wall, Gardner. The questions that keep returning to my mind is this: Why is it so disruptive? What is it about having access to ICT that makes it more difficult to be a traditional student? Is it the increased access to more/better/worse/different/wrong information, or the ability to communicate with remote friends when one should be reflecting/studying/quietly having a one-on-one conversation, or the fact that these technologies just don&#8217;t resemble the things that usually look like scholarship (the term paper, syllabus, lab report)? What about the cases where ICT enables students to study better, or include more perspectives, or have more &#8220;Aha!&#8221; moments?</p>
<p>What if it&#8217;s not just the ICT? What if it&#8217;s the intersection of ICT, faculty expectations, and student attitudes or abilities? I keep thinking there&#8217;s a deeper question here and I just can&#8217;t see it. Maybe I spend too much time on Twitter&#8230;</p>
<p>Not looking for answers, just adding to the pile of questions. Thanks for the post &#8212; it&#8217;s good to know you wonder about this too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
